Make vs IFTTT (2026)
A side-by-side comparison of pricing, features and real-world ratings to help you choose between Make and IFTTT.
| Feature | Make | IFTTT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| Starting Price | $9/mo | $3/mo |
| Free Trial | Yes | 7-day trial |
| G2 Rating | 4.7 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Best For | Small Teams | Freelancers |
| Reviews | 1,500 | 2,300 |
Key differences between Make and IFTTT
User sentiment favors Make: it averages 4.6/5 across 1,500 reviews versus 4.1/5 for IFTTT (2,300 reviews).
Make leans into visual scenarios and routers & filters, while IFTTT puts its weight behind applets and smart home — pick based on which of those you will actually use weekly.
Their sweet spots differ: Make is strongest for small teams, whereas IFTTT is built with freelancers in mind.
🏆 Our Verdict
Make is our overall pick, scoring 4.6/5 across 1500 reviews. That said, IFTTT remains a great option if you prioritise freelancers. Read the breakdown below before you decide.
Head to head
Make
Make (formerly Integromat) turns automation into a visual canvas: modules, routers and iterators snake across the screen, exposing logic that Zapier hides. That transparency enables genuinely complex scenarios — loops, aggregations, error handlers — at operation-based prices that undercut Zapier substantially at volume. The trade-off is a steeper on-ramp; it rewards operations-minded builders more than casual users automating a form-to-spreadsheet flow.
Make
Visual automation with serious power.
Visit Make →Pros
- ✓Powerful logic
- ✓Great value
- ✓Visual builder
Cons
- ✗Steeper learning curve
- ✗Fewer apps than Zapier
IFTTT
IFTTT remains the gentlest introduction to automation: if this, then that, across an ecosystem especially strong in smart home, phones and consumer services. Applets install in two taps, and the Pro tier is impressively cheap for multi-action logic. It is not built for business workflows — no complex branching, light app coverage for B2B SaaS — but for personal and IoT automation it still occupies a niche the heavyweight tools ignore.
IFTTT
Simple applets that connect your apps and devices.
Visit IFTTT →Pros
- ✓Very simple
- ✓Great for IoT
- ✓Cheap Pro plan
Cons
- ✗Limited business logic
- ✗Fewer pro integrations
How we compare tools
Every comparison on SaaS Compare follows the same recipe: we aggregate verified user ratings from G2 and Capterra, track published pricing (including free plans and trial terms), and weigh the practical pros and cons reported by real users. We refresh this data on a regular schedule and never let affiliate partnerships influence a verdict — the same criteria decide every matchup, including this Make vs IFTTT comparison.
Frequently asked questions
Is Make better than IFTTT?
Based on aggregated ratings, Make edges ahead with a 4.6/5 score. The right choice still depends on your budget and use case — Make suits small-teams, while IFTTT is strong for freelancers.
Which is cheaper, Make or IFTTT?
Make starts at a free plan and IFTTT starts at a free plan.
Does Make or IFTTT offer a free trial?
Make: 0-day trial. IFTTT: 7-day trial.
What do users say about Make and IFTTT?
Make averages 4.6/5 from 1,500 reviews (G2: 4.7/5, Capterra: 4.8/5). IFTTT averages 4.1/5 from 2,300 reviews (G2: 4.3/5, Capterra: 4.4/5). Ratings aggregate thousands of verified users, so small gaps are meaningful at this scale.
When should I pick IFTTT instead?
Despite the overall verdict, IFTTT is the better fit when very simple and great for iot matter most to your workflow, particularly for freelancers.