Make vs Zapier (2026)
A side-by-side comparison of pricing, features and real-world ratings to help you choose between Make and Zapier.
| Feature | Make | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| Starting Price | $9/mo | $20/mo |
| Free Trial | Yes | 14-day trial |
| G2 Rating | 4.7 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Best For | Small Teams | Freelancers |
| Reviews | 1,500 | 13,000 |
Key differences between Make and Zapier
User sentiment favors Make: it averages 4.6/5 across 1,500 reviews versus 4.5/5 for Zapier (13,000 reviews).
Make leans into visual scenarios and routers & filters, while Zapier puts its weight behind 7,000+ integrations and multi-step zaps — pick based on which of those you will actually use weekly.
Their sweet spots differ: Make is strongest for small teams, whereas Zapier is built with freelancers in mind.
🏆 Our Verdict
Make is our overall pick, scoring 4.6/5 across 1500 reviews. That said, Zapier remains a great option if you prioritise freelancers. Read the breakdown below before you decide.
Head to head
Make
Make (formerly Integromat) turns automation into a visual canvas: modules, routers and iterators snake across the screen, exposing logic that Zapier hides. That transparency enables genuinely complex scenarios — loops, aggregations, error handlers — at operation-based prices that undercut Zapier substantially at volume. The trade-off is a steeper on-ramp; it rewards operations-minded builders more than casual users automating a form-to-spreadsheet flow.
Make
Visual automation with serious power.
Visit Make →Pros
- ✓Powerful logic
- ✓Great value
- ✓Visual builder
Cons
- ✗Steeper learning curve
- ✗Fewer apps than Zapier
Zapier
Zapier is the connective glue of business software, with an integration catalog — 7,000+ apps — that no competitor approaches. Multi-step Zaps, filters, paths and now AI steps let non-developers automate real workflows in minutes, and Tables plus Interfaces edge it toward an app platform. Task-based pricing is the perennial complaint: high-volume automations get expensive fast, which is precisely where Make and n8n make their pitch.
Zapier
Connect 7,000+ apps with no code.
Visit Zapier →Pros
- ✓Largest app library
- ✓Easy to use
- ✓Free tier
Cons
- ✗Task pricing adds up
- ✗Limited logic vs rivals
How we compare tools
Every comparison on SaaS Compare follows the same recipe: we aggregate verified user ratings from G2 and Capterra, track published pricing (including free plans and trial terms), and weigh the practical pros and cons reported by real users. We refresh this data on a regular schedule and never let affiliate partnerships influence a verdict — the same criteria decide every matchup, including this Make vs Zapier comparison.
Frequently asked questions
Is Make better than Zapier?
Based on aggregated ratings, Make edges ahead with a 4.6/5 score. The right choice still depends on your budget and use case — Make suits small-teams, while Zapier is strong for freelancers.
Which is cheaper, Make or Zapier?
Make starts at a free plan and Zapier starts at a free plan.
Does Make or Zapier offer a free trial?
Make: 0-day trial. Zapier: 14-day trial.
What do users say about Make and Zapier?
Make averages 4.6/5 from 1,500 reviews (G2: 4.7/5, Capterra: 4.8/5). Zapier averages 4.5/5 from 13,000 reviews (G2: 4.5/5, Capterra: 4.7/5). Ratings aggregate thousands of verified users, so small gaps are meaningful at this scale.
When should I pick Zapier instead?
Despite the overall verdict, Zapier is the better fit when largest app library and easy to use matter most to your workflow, particularly for freelancers.