Make vs n8n (2026)
A side-by-side comparison of pricing, features and real-world ratings to help you choose between Make and n8n.
| Feature | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| Starting Price | $9/mo | $20/mo |
| Free Trial | Yes | 14-day trial |
| G2 Rating | 4.7 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Best For | Small Teams | Startups |
| Reviews | 1,500 | 700 |
Key differences between Make and n8n
Make leans into visual scenarios and routers & filters, while n8n puts its weight behind self-hostable and code nodes — pick based on which of those you will actually use weekly.
Their sweet spots differ: Make is strongest for small teams, whereas n8n is built with startups in mind.
🏆 Our Verdict
Make is our overall pick, scoring 4.6/5 across 1500 reviews. That said, n8n remains a great option if you prioritise startups. Read the breakdown below before you decide.
Head to head
Make
Make (formerly Integromat) turns automation into a visual canvas: modules, routers and iterators snake across the screen, exposing logic that Zapier hides. That transparency enables genuinely complex scenarios — loops, aggregations, error handlers — at operation-based prices that undercut Zapier substantially at volume. The trade-off is a steeper on-ramp; it rewards operations-minded builders more than casual users automating a form-to-spreadsheet flow.
Make
Visual automation with serious power.
Visit Make →Pros
- ✓Powerful logic
- ✓Great value
- ✓Visual builder
Cons
- ✗Steeper learning curve
- ✗Fewer apps than Zapier
n8n
n8n is the automation tool engineers reach for: source-available, self-hostable, with code nodes wherever visual building runs out of road. Recent releases lean hard into AI agent workflows, making it a favorite for LLM orchestration. Self-hosting eliminates per-task fees entirely — compelling at scale — while the cloud version stays competitive. The catalog is smaller than Zapier's and the polish assumes technical comfort, which is exactly its audience.
n8n
Source-available workflow automation you can self-host.
Visit n8n →Pros
- ✓Self-host option
- ✓Developer-friendly
- ✓Fair pricing
Cons
- ✗Needs technical setup
- ✗Smaller app library
How we compare tools
Every comparison on SaaS Compare follows the same recipe: we aggregate verified user ratings from G2 and Capterra, track published pricing (including free plans and trial terms), and weigh the practical pros and cons reported by real users. We refresh this data on a regular schedule and never let affiliate partnerships influence a verdict — the same criteria decide every matchup, including this Make vs n8n comparison.
Frequently asked questions
Is Make better than n8n?
Based on aggregated ratings, Make edges ahead with a 4.6/5 score. The right choice still depends on your budget and use case — Make suits small-teams, while n8n is strong for startups.
Which is cheaper, Make or n8n?
Make starts at a free plan and n8n starts at a free plan.
Does Make or n8n offer a free trial?
Make: 0-day trial. n8n: 14-day trial.
What do users say about Make and n8n?
Make averages 4.6/5 from 1,500 reviews (G2: 4.7/5, Capterra: 4.8/5). n8n averages 4.6/5 from 700 reviews (G2: 4.6/5, Capterra: 4.7/5). Ratings aggregate thousands of verified users, so small gaps are meaningful at this scale.
When should I pick n8n instead?
Despite the overall verdict, n8n is the better fit when self-host option and developer-friendly matter most to your workflow, particularly for startups.