Google Meet vs Microsoft Teams (2026)
A side-by-side comparison of pricing, features and real-world ratings to help you choose between Google Meet and Microsoft Teams.
| Feature | Google Meet | Microsoft Teams |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Video Conferencing |
| Starting Price | $6/mo | $4/mo |
| Free Trial | 14-day trial | 30-day trial |
| G2 Rating | 4.6 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Best For | Remote Teams | Enterprise |
| Reviews | 42,000 | 15,000 |
Key differences between Google Meet and Microsoft Teams
User sentiment favors Google Meet: it averages 4.5/5 across 42,000 reviews versus 4.3/5 for Microsoft Teams (15,000 reviews).
Google Meet leans into browser-based calls and calendar integration, while Microsoft Teams puts its weight behind meetings and channels & chat — pick based on which of those you will actually use weekly.
Their sweet spots differ: Google Meet is strongest for remote teams, whereas Microsoft Teams is built with enterprise in mind.
🏆 Our Verdict
Google Meet is our overall pick, scoring 4.5/5 across 42000 reviews. That said, Microsoft Teams remains a great option if you prioritise enterprise. Read the breakdown below before you decide.
Head to head
Google Meet
Google Meet wins on friction: a calendar invite becomes a working video call in one click, in any browser, with no client to install or update. Live captions, noise cancellation and Gemini-powered summaries come along on Workspace plans that many companies already pay for. It lacks Zoom's webinar depth and granular host controls, but for everyday internal meetings inside a Google shop, adding another tool is hard to justify.
Google Meet
Video calls built into Google Workspace.
Visit Google Meet →Pros
- ✓No install
- ✓Workspace integration
- ✓Free tier
Cons
- ✗Fewer webinar features
- ✗Best inside Google
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams is less a meetings app than the connective tissue of Microsoft 365: chat, channels, calls and file collaboration bolted directly onto SharePoint, Outlook and Office. For organizations standardized on Microsoft, its marginal cost is near zero and its admin controls are enterprise-grade. The experience can feel heavy — sprawling settings, occasional sluggishness — and companies outside the Microsoft stack rarely choose it on merit alone.
Chat, meetings and collaboration in Microsoft 365.
Visit Microsoft Teams →Pros
- ✓Bundled with 365
- ✓All-in-one
- ✓Enterprise-grade
Cons
- ✗Can feel bloated
- ✗Best inside Microsoft
How we compare tools
Every comparison on SaaS Compare follows the same recipe: we aggregate verified user ratings from G2 and Capterra, track published pricing (including free plans and trial terms), and weigh the practical pros and cons reported by real users. We refresh this data on a regular schedule and never let affiliate partnerships influence a verdict — the same criteria decide every matchup, including this Google Meet vs Microsoft Teams comparison.
Frequently asked questions
Is Google Meet better than Microsoft Teams?
Based on aggregated ratings, Google Meet edges ahead with a 4.5/5 score. The right choice still depends on your budget and use case — Google Meet suits remote-teams, while Microsoft Teams is strong for enterprise.
Which is cheaper, Google Meet or Microsoft Teams?
Google Meet starts at a free plan and Microsoft Teams starts at a free plan.
Does Google Meet or Microsoft Teams offer a free trial?
Google Meet: 14-day trial. Microsoft Teams: 30-day trial.
What do users say about Google Meet and Microsoft Teams?
Google Meet averages 4.5/5 from 42,000 reviews (G2: 4.6/5, Capterra: 4.5/5). Microsoft Teams averages 4.3/5 from 15,000 reviews (G2: 4.4/5, Capterra: 4.5/5). Ratings aggregate thousands of verified users, so small gaps are meaningful at this scale.
When should I pick Microsoft Teams instead?
Despite the overall verdict, Microsoft Teams is the better fit when bundled with 365 and all-in-one matter most to your workflow, particularly for enterprise.